The first one was Mr. Darcy's Diary by Amanda Grange. I liked this one, though at times thought it was kind of 'Darcy for Dummies'. More of a Romance than P&P, but was nonetheless an enjoyable read. I think I might prefer this version of our hero to the other book (though not to the original). At first it started off a bit dull, but I quickly found myself enjoying the narrative, particularly his mixed delight and wariness at Lizzy's sharp wit and laughing manners. Amanda Grange knows her audience, and gives them exactly what they want. She never pretends to be Austen, but is pretty adept nonetheless. One of the things I liked best was the few pages which chronicle events that happened after the wedding, up to the Darcy's first Christmas. It flowed seamlessly from the previous narrative, and seemed like it could have been a feasible end even for Jane Austen. It's not as meaningful or layered as P&P, but definitely sweet and may cause you to get a case of the warm fuzzies. My largest complaint: In a letter to his friend Darcy, Bingley calls Jane "an adorable angel". That's a little blech-worthy, even for Mister Bingley.
Much of the parts that take place between the Netherfield Ball and Darcy's visit to Rosings have only brief mentions of "E", and is much more occupied with keeping a sunken, heartbroken Bingley from despair (and from the clutches of a crafty courtesan) and trying to help frail Georgiana recover from a much more violent version of events that took place between herself and the perfidious Mister Wickham. As to the character of Georgiana, I could have done without so much of her. I felt that she was written very contrary to what Austen portrayed, a shy sweet girl becomes a willful, sometimes bratty kid sister. Charles Bingley, however, has never been more interesting than this bitter, heartbroken version. I found myself liking his character at times more than Darcy's!
The Meat of the story takes places in describing the events from Darcy and *Col. Fitzwilliam's arrival at Rosings to months later when he stumbles across Elizabeth taking in the view at Pemberly. To myself, the best part of the book is his self-delusion that Elizabeth Bennett is nothing more than a pretty face, to the realization that he can't stay away from her and is in the middle of a full-blown obsession. His desperation as he observes her, the constant need to be near her to see her is in fact an overwhelming difference from the former, slightly disturbed and put-out regard he had for Elizabeth. Darcy describes himself as desperate and half-crazed. And the events that take place after her resounding rejection show our hero in such a state of despair, anger, and self-loathing that we can't help but feel for him. All in all I would have been happy if they had omitted the debauchery provided to them by Byron, I felt that the events that took place at Byron's estate dragged on and lost all of their shock value. Of course, as he must, our Hero emerges "properly humbled" and hopefully forever faithful to his Elizabeth. I can't say I loved this book in context with P&P, but as a stand-alone story it was a solid, entertaining read. But proceed with caution, if you do not want your image of the Mr. Darcy in anyway tarnished, than this is not the book for you.
*One thing I found of interest was in both of these books, Col. Fitzwilliam had more than a passing fancy for Elizabeth. In fact both versions lamented to Darcy that she was "the perfect woman but for want of fortune" and both versions seemed to consider actually offering to her during the visit at Rosings, giving both versions of Darcy a "close call" that they did not, she undoubtedly would have accepted.
7 comments:
Excellent analysis of these two Darcy point-of-view stories. I liked both, but for different reasons.
I think it amusing that you had the most to say about The Private Diary of MD. It is a complement to the author Maya Slater that she piqued strong opinions of what Austen's Darcy was apposed to her own. Amanda Grange's Mr. D's Diary is a great book, but Slater's you will remember over it because the strong feeling that it evoked. Even though I did not agree with the Lord Byron interjection either, the rest of the book is funny and quite enjoyable.
Thanks for the reviews. You are an excellent writer.
Thanks so much! I did realize after-the-fact that I had more to say about "Private Diary" than the other one, I guess because it provided such a more detailed and provocative picture of Darcy. Grange's book was good, great even, (I have on order the Captain Wentworth and Col. Brandon diaries as well) but I feel like Slater's is the one that sticks with you.
I greatly enjoyed your comparison. I recently read Ms. Slater's book and agree with what you said about it. I hope you like Captain Wentworth's and Colonel Brandon's diary!
Great reviews! Sounds like I might like the first one, but not the second. The second just sounds like it screams "this is not like Austen's character at all", because Darcy doesn't strike me as a debauched kind of person. Rochester, fair enough, but DARCY?! Noooo!
No he is most definitely not Jane Austen's character. I think it's like comparing Bronte's Mr. Rochester to Edward Rochester in Wide Sargasso Sea. Not exactly right.
INNIT THOUGH!! *cough* I mean, "you are quite right, I couldn't agree with you more. Rhys and Brontë wrote about two very different people". And I'll cut the rest of the train of thought short, because I'm afraid it will just descend into profanity. ;)
From your review, it sounds a bit like the author has confused Darcy with an extreme version of Rochester. And that's so wrong I can hear Darcy's screams echoing all the way from Pemberley!
Profanity is perfectly welcome here, and after Wide Sargasso Sea, I was so upset I think I unloaded quite a string of profanity myself.
The Pamela Aidan (the 'Gentleman' trilogy) version of Darcy seems to have a few Rochester points about him, though in a good way...he seems to have a bit of the wry Rochester humor..."what the deuce" and all that.
Post a Comment